3.5K
Publications
180.4K
Citations
5K
Authors
1.5K
Institutions
Information-Driven Regulatory Competition
1995 - 2001
During 1995-2001, research highlights how enforcement architecture and governance shape unfair competition through private contracting, hold-up dynamics, and regulatory discretion, with private enforcement complementing or substituting for public policy in industrial markets. The literature also foregrounds information economics and signaling in competition—standards, certification, and quality regimes mediate consumer risk and strategic firm behavior, with emphasis on harmonization, mutual recognition, and signaling as mechanisms that can improve or distort welfare. Additionally, aftermarkets and service networks emerge as competitive arenas where control over proprietary aftermarket products, leasing policies, and ISO standards influence pricing, entry barriers, and welfare beyond primary markets; intellectual property licensing and rent-seeking dynamics further reconfigure welfare and market power; and policy framing and trade regulation test unilateralism and market discipline through product/process distinctions and regulatory design.
• Enforcement architecture and governance shape unfair competition through private contracting, hold-up dynamics, and regulatory discretion, showing cases where private enforcement complements or substitutes for public policy in industrial markets [15], [10], [6], [12], [4].
• Information economics and signaling in competition: standards, certification, and quality regimes mediate consumer risk and strategic firm behavior, illustrating how harmonization, mutual recognition, and signaling improve or distort welfare [17], [2], [14], [20], [5].
• Aftermarkets and service networks as competitive arenas: control over proprietary aftermarket products, leasing policies, and ISOs shapes pricing, entry barriers, and welfare beyond primary markets [3], [4], [12].
• Intellectual property, licensing, and rent-seeking dynamics influence unfair competition: strategic software protection, lemons-like concealment, and strategy around IP rights reconfigure welfare and market power [9], [8], [5], [13].
• Policy framing and trade regulation challenge unilateralism and market discipline: product/process distinctions, standard regimes, and regulatory design affect cross-border competition and the legitimacy of protective measures [20], [2], [15].
Popular Keywords
Transaction-Cost IP Antitrust
2002 - 2009
Intellectual Property as Strategy
2010 - 2016
Platform Governance and Coordination
2017 - 2023